Menu
I have been getting lost in the weeds lately in JF's Goldbach conjecture argument. To such an extent that I believe there could be some fundamental issues JF may have overlooked that doom it. Or, what is probably more likely, I am missing something. After all, JF's stream was pretty rushed, demonstrating a lengthy, but elegant set of arguments. Therefore, I want to perhaps explore the T-set in more detail and maybe connect the two constraints with what we now know from previous posts. From post 2 , I proved that, for the D-set, the following logical rules were true: This can be proved identically for the T-set. Again, the assumption we have been working with must be true for the rules to be practical. The assumption being, T is not prime. For the sake of clarity, this post will seek to demonstrate to the reader the following:
By JFT, we know necessarily that T and E are coprime, so there is a contradiction.
Let us see where this leaves the rest of the proof. I have some ideas to elaborate on from here and what we already know.
- AF
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI'm just trying to learn about everything I can. Archives
June 2020
Categories
All
|